Saturday, May 9, 2009

Tweet Your arXiv Preprints

Colleagues/

Two Weeks Ago, I Posted A Query On The Practice Of 'Twitter Science' :

"I Am Greatly Interested In Learning Of Any / All Formal (or Informal) Initiatives That Have Incorporated Twitter (Or Similiar Mobile Features And / Or Functionality) Within Science (And / Or Technology) Projects, Publications And / Or Conferences."


Well ... ... ...

" ... Robert Simpson, a PhD student from Cardiff University in the UK, has created a website that ranks papers appearing on the arXiv preprint server according to their popularity on Twitter.


ArXiv On Twitter

His website searches Twitter for tweets that mention an arXiv url or posts that are tagged “#arxiv” and include the paper’s unique identifier. The website retrieves and lists all the tweets and produces a table of the most popular papers, authors and arXiv categories ranked by how many tweets they have received.


[arXiv on Twitter: [snip] This project aims to collect this information and use it to highlight the most interesting and talked-about papers].

The website has only been active since 16 April, but already there have been 75 tweets quoting arXiv papers.

The paper ranked fourth in the table, however, as far as I could tell was an April fool’s joke, which proclaimed that pi has changed since 1900 BC. So maybe think twice before taking such a ranking seriously."

Source


And Who Says I'm Crazy ... ? [:-)]

/Gerry

1 comment:

Stevan Harnad said...

I bet that the twitter count will correlate highly with the download count -- though your twitter metric may be an even earlier index than the download count, or the download count growth rate:

Brody, T., Harnad, S. and Carr, L. (2006) Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact. Journal of the American Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 57 (8). pp. 1060-1072.

which is automatically generated by Tom Brody's citebase: http://www.citebase.org/

Of course, there are many potential metrics of research impact, many of them highly intercorrelated:

Harnad, S. (2007) Open Access Scientometrics and the UK Research Assessment Exercise. In Proceedings of 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics 11(1), pp. 27-33, Madrid, Spain. Torres-Salinas, D. and Moed, H. F., Eds. (2009)Scientometrics 79 (1)

What is needed is to jointly validate them all, and initialize their relative weights, based on a multiple regression analysis, validated against an external criterion, such as peer rankings.